Guitar Market Brand Health and Consumer Preferences

Case Study

Published Q3 2023

A man and boy sitting closely together, playing acoustic guitars and looking at each other.

With Taylor Guitars as the focal brand throughout this study, we explored the guitar market’s competitive set and consumer behaviors. This study, conducted in August 2023, provides an example of how Langston approaches, operationalizes, and reports brand health and positioning, consumer willingness to pay, and consumer usage, habits, and preferences.

Six icons representing a funnel, a barricade, a checklist with a pie chart, a network diagram, a line graph, and a group of smiley and sad faces.
Download study

Overview

Taylor Guitar’s mission is to improve the guitar-playing experience. In an industry surrounded by heritage giants (such as Yamaha, Gibson, and Fender), Taylor works to build its legacy through a commitment to quality and innovation. Highly regarded as a leader in the guitar space, Taylor strives to compete with other brands as a premier retailer and manufacturer of acoustic and electric guitars.

In this report, we use our modular research method to explore the key areas of opportunity for Taylor via identifying the brand’s overall health and position in the market, consumers’ willingness to spend, and what guitar players are actually seeking out of these brands and their products.

Insights

A report page about Taylor Guitars with a logo and a paragraph on the left, and a background image of an acoustic guitar with five icon illustrations and related text on the right.

Insight 1: With one out of every two consumers aware of Taylor guitars, the brand has a strong position in the overall guitar market and is positioned as an industry leader.

That said, Taylor performs at best on par – more likely below – with other industry leaders such as Yamaha, Gibson, Fender, and Martin on key funnel metrics. Taylor continues to lag further against its core competitors as the funnel progresses, suggesting that the brand may have an “I’ve heard of it” problem.

Bar chart comparing guitar brand popularity over years, including Taylor, Yamaha, Martin, and Ibanez, with Taylor showing the highest values.

Insight 2: Brand is the top driver of product decisions in the space, and consumers are willing to pay high premiums for the brands they are most loyal to. Consumers are willing to invest in the brands they find most trusted.

Brand’s high relative importance suggests that the name behind a guitar seems to be the first consideration when selecting what to purchase. Price, on the other hand, is evidentially secondary to consumers as their primary concerns seem to revolve around brand reputation and the guitar’s functionality. The importance of functionality is illustrated by the weight consumers put towards the tuner/pickup.

Bar chart showing percentages for different reasons for job dissatisfaction: 35% low pay, 25% lack of recognition, 15% poor management, 15% limited career advancement, 10% work-life balance issues.

Consumers are brand driven and price insensitive in this market. These guitar players are loyal to the brands they trust most, making name value a huge commodity towards individual product selection. The chart below illustrates that consumers who prefer Taylor are consistently more likely to select a Taylor guitar for $1,750 over another brand’s product for $500 less. 27% of consumers would buy the higher priced Taylor over Fender, 34% would pay more for Taylor over Martin, and nearly one out of every two consumers would buy the more expensive Taylor guitar over that of Ibanez.

Bar graph comparing the number of guitars used by three musicians, with Taylor guitars having the highest number, followed by Martin & Co., and Ibanez with the lowest; includes logos of Taylor, Martin, and Ibanez.

Insight 3: Taylor’s target audience lives with guitar playing enthusiasts over a universal market approach. These consumers are already more invested in Taylor’s brand – with higher rates of conversion at integral stages of the funnel – and are the most likely to spend on products in the category.

Consumers who identify playing guitar as their number one hobby over a general hobby amongst others – also known as “enthusiasts” – are more likely to know what Taylor stands for than the total market and have plenty of overlap with intermediate and advanced players, making them a prime audience for Taylor to target.

Bar chart comparing textbook prices in 1980 and 2022 for various book categories. In 1980, prices range from about $42 to $70, while in 2022, they range from about $155 to $245.

Insight 4: Taylor successfully establishes trust amongst consumers, giving them permission to play in the space; and by focusing  innovation towards making the guitar playing experience smoother, easier, more convenient, the brand is likely to build up their reputation and get even bigger buy-in from potential and current customers.

Logo for Taylor Acoustic Guitars with the word "Taylor" in large, stylized red font and "Acoustic Guitars" in smaller red font below. Background features black, with blotches overlaid.

Innovative is one of the top appealing traits to consumers in this market – following trustworthy and alongside genuine, classic, and traditional – making it all the better that this is an area Taylor already finds success and association. In developing and messaging towards novelty and enhanced functionality, Taylor will be able to become the All-Star in the space.

Fender, Ibanez, Martin, Taylor, Yamaha, Gibson guitar brand comparison chart with color-coded ratings across six categories.

DISCLAIMER: We base our research, recommendations, and forecasts on techniques, information and sources we believe to be reliable. We cannot guarantee future accuracy and results. The Langston Co. will not be liable for any loss or damage caused by a reader's reliance on our research.

More insights, more data. Download this study to learn more.

A man and a boy sitting on a bed playing guitars together, with the boy focusing on his guitar, and the man guiding him.

In order to conduct unbiased and objective research, this study was privately funded by The Langston Co. We did not receive endorsement or financial support of any kind from any third party.

Thanks for taking time to read our research. With questions, comments, or suggestions about this study, please contact us at contact@thelangstonco.com.